It turns out, when you call academia to the carpet, they take it personal. His findings were later reviewed and debunked by a second team of researchers from the University of Iowa. It was neither peer reviewed nor scientifically validated. Kyle Novak - a retired Air Force LTC that specializes in data and math - who happened to work in the office of one of the congressional leaders who led the pause in implementation of the test. The findings of that study can be found here. The previous post cites a 'critical review' of an independent study done by the University of Iowa to find which combination of exercises that can predict a Soldier's ability to perform the Warrior Tasks and Battle Drills. Finally, the independent review of the original study found that a well-qualified team of scientists and military personnel conducted it, has used appropriate and rigorous methodologies, and is technically sound, resulting in valid findings.įirst of all, context matters. The timing of the article is suspicious at best given the Army plans to have a test of record on April 1st. There are valid concerns and discussions to be had over the test, but this isn't one of them. Tl dr: the ACFT is an incredibly valid predictor of warrior tasks and battle drills performance. Everything discussed is publicly available and I will provide sources where possible. I will not be discussing the future of the ACFT, but I will not allow for false narratives to set the foundation for whatever that decision is. Use the report button.ĭisclaimer: this is the PAO. Do not answer n00b questions on the main boards. (8) N00b / Joining questions go in the Weekly Question Thread (or Recruiter Thread) stickied at the top, in the black-on-gold link at the top, and in the sidebar.Links from USAWTFM, ASMDSS and similar at moderator discretion. Moderators reserve the right to change flair at will. The purpose of flair is so we know you have a background in a particular subject matter. (6) Please keep your flair text rank or duty-related.Post the description along with your obscure MOS code. (5) We don't all know what a 12V or a 35Q or a 94L is.This includes questions about duty stations, MOSs, boots, or what to take to the field. It is very likely that whatever you are about to post has already been posted before. (3) This is not a pro-military circlejerk, but please have some sources to base the more controversial topics on.Consider /r/armycirclejerk or /r/justbootthings instead. If it is appropriate for /r/AdviceAnimals or any other meme or image macro subreddit, it is not appropriate for /r/army. No memes, low effort posts, reposts or crossposts from /r/all. (2) Ensure your posts actually encourage discussion.(1) If your post could be answered by your NCO, Google or a 5 minute call with an Army Recruiter, then please do so.We welcome civil discussion in the modmail but will not engage with flamebait, spam or outright attacks without the end goal of courteous dialogue. Moderators are the final word in whether a post will be removed or not. Overtly political posts are not allowed.ħ. Suggestions to do anything fraudulent, immoral or illegal are not tolerated.Ħ. This also applies to discussing exploits in course software.ĥ. Asking for or providing the answers to online or in-class military courses or tests is not allowed. Same for fundraising requests and ads for your products, as well as survey/research requests or petitions.Ĥ. Click here or on "wiki" in the top tab menu. This subreddit has a wiki page containing information and links to answered questions. Weekly Question Thread (N00b thread)įor all of your joining and reclassing needs. This subreddit is geared toward the United States Army, but all are welcome to join regardless of military service. Weekly Question Thread Recruiter Thread Welcome to /r/army
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |